RM Education AB

School group with 2 school unitsSkolkoll's statistics include school units that are open/active in Skolverket's register. Dormant units (Vilande — temporarily without students) and discontinued units (Upphörd — permanently closed) are excluded. through 1 operating providers in 1 municipalities.

RM Education AB is a school group with 2 school units through 1 provider/entity with school units. Average merit value: 235.1 (above national average) with 48.8% qualified teachers (below national average).

2 school units420 pupils48.8% qualified teachers
Level: school group/ownership chainCompare: providers and school unitsVerify providersVerify schoolsData and sources
This group has a single operating provider. See RM Bildning AB for detailed information.

Group snapshot

School units
2
Pupils
420
Operating providers
1
Municipalities / Counties
1 / 1
Average merit value
235.1 (2 schools)+6.6 vs national avg
Qualified teachers
48.8%-24.5 pp vs national avg
Pupils per teacher
10.5
Group organisation number
5591946909

Company events in the group

This timeline combines Bolagsverket registry events for companies in the group structure with observed group periods from Skolkoll's annual-report-based group mapping. Observed ownership periods are not legal acquisition dates.

  1. RM Education AB: Annual report filed - Period: 2019-02-12 - 2020-06-30 - Document: arsredovisning

    Swedish Companies Registration Office annual reports

  2. RM Bildning AB: Company registered

    Swedish Companies Registration Office HVD

  3. Date unavailable

    RM Education AB: Observed in group - Observed as current part of RM Education AB.

    Skolkoll group mapping from annual reportsObserved

School-form mix

Compulsory school
2
After-school care
1
Preschool class
1

Merit-value spread

Range of year-9 merit values across the group's 2 schools with data.

Min: 220.9Average: 235.1 (national avg: 228.5)Max: 249.2

Group schools vs municipal schools (SALSA-adjusted)

Comparison of SALSA residuals: the group's 2 compulsory schools against 46 municipal compulsory schools in the same municipalities. The SALSA model adjusts for pupils' socioeconomic background.

+41.6
Better than municipal schools
Group: 37.5 | Municipal: -4.1(SALSA residual, merit points)

Based on the SALSA model which adjusts for pupils' socioeconomic background. Positive values indicate higher merit value than expected. Data: 2024/25.

Teacher resources

Teacher density and teacher certification for the group's 2 compulsory and upper-secondary schools covering 420 pupils. Municipal benchmarks are weighted by pupil count in the municipalities where the group operates schools.

10.7Pupils per teacher9.8–11.2-1.2 vs municipal benchmark
50.2%Qualified teachers45.5%–52%-24.7 pp vs municipal benchmark
57.8%Subject qualification1 schools with data
95.3%Stable employment1 schools with data
11.2%Teacher turnover1 schools with data
Teacher salary per pupilBlocked by salary/FTE data
MunicipalitySchoolsPupils/teacherMunicipal bench. (pupils/teach.)Qualified teachersMunicipal bench. (qualified)
Göteborg210.711.950.2%74.9%
Method and remaining data gaps

Pupils per teacher and qualified teachers come from Skolverket's school-unit statistics. Pupils per teacher is weighted by pupil count. Percentage metrics are weighted by teacher FTE where available, or derived from pupil count and pupils per teacher. Municipal comparisons come from Kolada and switch between compulsory-school and upper-secondary KPIs depending on school form.

Current data lacks exact per-subject qualification, teacher stability as a share retained for at least three years, teacher sick leave, and teacher salary and teacher FTE per provider/school. They are therefore not shown as a proxy from total personnel cost, since that would mix teachers with other staff.

Source: Skolverket and Kolada. Teacher salary per pupil is not shown because teacher salary and teacher FTE are missing from current data.

Pedagogical resources

Learning materials, teaching tools and the school library across the group's 2 compulsory and upper-secondary schools (420 pupils in the basis).

0.0%Schools with a library (0 of 2)
Method and limitations

The cost figure is Skolverket's "learning tools and school library per pupil" line (learning materials, equipment and library combined), weighted by pupils across the group's compulsory and upper-secondary schools; the sector median compares against other groups. The library share shows the proportion of schools that report having a school library (presence, not staffing with a qualified librarian per the 2023 library-law requirement). The number of 1:1 devices with lifespan, and a separate IT / digital-materials cost, are not tagged in current sources and are therefore not shown.

Student health and support functions

Support signals across the group's 2 compulsory and upper-secondary schools (420 pupils in the basis).

3,258Pupils per study-and-career counsellor (lower is better)
Method and limitations

Three available signals, weighted by pupils across the group's compulsory and upper-secondary schools: counsellor density (pupils per study-and-career counsellor, where lower is better), student-health cost per pupil, and a special-support experience index from Skolinspektionen's school survey. Staffing of school nurse, doctor, psychologist and counsellor in FTEs, as well as study guidance, mother-tongue tuition and Swedish as a second language, are not tagged per school in current sources and are not shown. The special-support figure is a perceived index, not a staffing measure.

Results and engagement

Results and satisfaction signals across the group's 2 compulsory and upper-secondary schools (420 pupils in the basis).

84.2%Eligibility for upper-secondary (year 9) (sector median 93.1%)
Method and limitations

Eligibility for upper-secondary (year 9), upper-secondary exam within three years (higher-ed-prep and vocational programmes respectively) and a satisfaction index for support from home from the school survey, weighted by pupils across the group's schools; the sector median refers to eligibility. Skolinspektionen's full attitude survey and the number of reported abuse cases are not available as structured per-school data and are not shown. The satisfaction index is based on a single survey question and is not a measure of pupil influence or engagement at large.

Financial profile

Company finance from annual reports for 1 of 1 known companies in the current group structure (latest report: 30/06/2020).1 active school providers/entities are represented as school operators in the group. School and pupil counts only include open school units in Skolverket's school register (dormant and discontinued excluded).

0 MSEKOperating profit
100.0%Equity ratio

Source: Bolagsverket (Swedish Companies Registration Office), latest annual reports in Skolkoll's database. Figures sum companies where annual-report data exists, including holding or service companies when present. They are therefore not split per pupil or school voucher in Skolkoll's current data. No time series is available in current data.

Method for personnel and costs
  • Personnel costs are reported annual-report fields and are shown as absolute amounts and as a share of revenue.
  • Personnel cost per employee uses the reported average number of employees. It is not a pure salary figure and normally includes social-security contributions and other personnel expenses.
  • Employees means the annual report's average employees where available. Skolkoll does not label this as FTE unless full-time equivalents are separately tagged.
  • Other external costs may include premises, but are not used as premises cost per pupil because rent and premises costs are not separately identified in the current projection.
  • CEO/board remuneration and substitute-teacher costs are not shown as KPIs here until they can be separated robustly from notes or income-statement line items.

Returns and profitability

The basis includes 1 companies with usable financial fields (latest report: 30/06/2020). Metrics are summed bottom-up across companies in the current group structure and only shown where usable denominators exist.

0.0%ROEProfit for the year / equity
Comparison with the largest groups by known revenue
GroupRevenueEBITDAROEROCE
DeMina Holding AB2,713 MSEK3.6%10.2%34.8%
Cedergrenska AB1,251.8 MSEK15.2%5.9%1.1%
Tisenhult-gruppen AB883.4 MSEK10.7%3.3%7.1%
Dibber AS565.4 MSEK-0.2%8.5%-1.7%
Bina Holding AB197.8 MSEK4.2%1.7%21.2%
Dille Bolagen Aktiebolag193.1 MSEK13.4%9.6%12.4%
Procurama AB187.9 MSEK23.4%18.0%6.0%
Amerikanska Gymnasiet i Sverige AB182.1 MSEK7.0%62.3%84.4%
AcadeMedia AB173.6 MSEK9.1%1.1%25.0%
Stiftelsen Livets Ord, Bibelcenter O Förlag170.7 MSEK4.5%2.6%3.2%
Minervaskolan i Umeå AB161.5 MSEK8.0%0.2%4.7%
Serra Invest AB143.4 MSEK-2.4%-203.0%-46.3%
People Productions Sweden AB136.8 MSEK4.6%36.8%50.4%
Västerholms Friskola AB134.6 MSEK7.1%0.0%181.0%
Göteborgs Tekniska College AB131.8 MSEK1.6%2.0%2.5%
Anton i Skåne AB127.4 MSEK4.4%17.1%8.7%
Svensson Enterprises AB123.7 MSEK5.8%-6.5%2.9%
Västbergaskolan AB121.7 MSEK4.6%74.5%93.4%
Ekberg, Lund & Partners Aktiebolag114.6 MSEK10.3%19.1%11.1%
A.S. Febo AB106.7 MSEK-2.5%-52.3%-72.9%
Method and limitations

EBITDA margin is operating profit plus depreciation and amortization divided by revenue. ROE uses profit for the year divided by equity. ROCE uses operating profit divided by total assets minus current liabilities. CAGR uses the longest available revenue history up to five years. Listed ESEF rows that are already consolidated group totals are excluded from the bottom-up sum.

Balance sheet and risk

Balance-sheet risk from annual reports for 1 of 1 known companies (latest report: 30/06/2020). Based on a bottom-up aggregate of companies with annual-report data.

0xDebt-to-equity (D/E)Debt 0 MSEK
0.1 MSEKLiquid funds
Method and limitations
  • Debt-to-equity is total debt divided by equity. When current and long-term liabilities are missing, total assets minus equity is used where the value is plausible.
  • Goodwill, liquid funds and interest expense come from tagged iXBRL fields when available. Missing fields are not shown.
  • Rapid changes are flagged from the latest available history point and should be read as signals for manual review, not as a credit assessment.

Operating providers

ProviderSchoolsPupilsAverage merit valueQualified teachers
RM Bildning AB2420235.148.8%

Download school data: CSV JSON

Municipal footprint

MunicipalitySchool units
Göteborg2

Top merit-value schools

All 2 schools

SchoolMunicipalityProviderPupilsQualified teachersMerit value
Communityskolan GårdstenGöteborgRM Bildning AB29052%249.2
Communityskolan TynneredGöteborgRM Bildning AB13045.5%220.9

Sources and citation

The group page combines Skolverket's school-unit register and statistics with Bolagsverket's group and company data. Skolkoll's group view covers open school units in Skolverket's register (dormant and discontinued school units excluded). School forms in the data: 2 compulsory school, 1 after-school care, 1 preschool class. Adult education and operations without a school unit are not included in these school counts.

Cite
Skolkoll (2024). RM Education AB. Skolkoll.se. Retrieved 2024-12-31 from https://skolkoll.se/en/school-group/rm-education-ab-946909/
Permalink + date
skolkoll.se/en/school-group/rm-education-ab-946909 — retrieved 2024-12-31 (data: Skolverket, Bolagsverket, RM Education AB, 2024/25)
Show BibTeX
@misc{skolkoll2024_rmeducationab,
  author = {Skolkoll},
  title = {RM Education AB},
  year = {2024},
  url = {https://skolkoll.se/en/school-group/rm-education-ab-946909/},
  note = {Retrieved 2024-12-31. Data: Skolverket, Bolagsverket, RM Education AB, 2024/25}
}
License: CC BY 4.0 · Source: Skolverket, Bolagsverket, RM Education AB, 2024/25

Common questions about RM Education AB

How many schools does RM Education AB have?
RM Education AB has 2 school units across 1 municipality, run by 1 provider. The average merit value is 235.1 (national average 228.5). Figures cover the school units counted as part of the group in Skolverket's data.
In which municipalities does RM Education AB operate?
RM Education AB has school units in Göteborg. 1 municipality in total.
How does RM Education AB compare with municipal schools?
Adjusted for pupils' socioeconomic background (SALSA, 2024/25), RM Education AB's compulsory schools perform better than municipal alternatives in the same municipalities. The SALSA residual is +37.5 for RM Education AB against -4.1 for municipal schools — a difference of +41.6 points.

Statistics: academic year 2024/25. Source: Skolverket, SCB.About the data.
— = data not available in the source.